Last revised: 30 May 2026 · Reviewed by the Baby Name Finder editorial team

We list the source for every one of the 15 supported languages. Where a national registry publishes annual top-name rankings, that registry is the primary source. Where no central registry exists, we use the most recent peer-reviewed academic survey or the relevant religious or cultural reference, and we say so plainly. The "last checked" column is the date an editor most recently verified that the source URL is live and the figures are current.

How to read this page. Each language has a primary source (for popularity rankings) and one or more secondary sources (for traditional and historical names, etymology, and native-script forms). Where two sources disagree, the one listed first is the one we follow by default; we note the disagreement on the affected name page.

Primary sources, per language

Language Primary source Kind Coverage Last checked
🇺🇸🇬🇧EnglishU.S. Social Security Administration — Popular Baby Names (US); UK Office for National Statistics — Baby names in England & WalesNational registryTop 1,000, annual2026-05-25
🇪🇸SpanishInstituto Nacional de Estadística (INE)National registryTop 100 boys + girls; per-province extended lists2026-05-25
🇫🇷FrenchINSEE — Fichier des prénomsNational registryAll names with ≥3 births per year, 1900–latest2026-05-25
🇩🇪GermanGesellschaft für deutsche Sprache (GfdS) — Vornamen-Statistik, drawing on data from DestatisLinguistic society + national statisticsAnnual top 10–5002026-05-25
🇮🇹ItalianISTAT — Nomi dei natiNational registryTop 30 boys + girls; full historical series since 19992026-05-25
🇧🇷🇵🇹PortugueseIBGE Nomes (Brazil); INE PortugalNational registriesBrazil: full historical series; Portugal: annual top 1002026-05-25
🇸🇦ArabicBehind the Name — Arabic submissions; BabyCenter Arabia; academic onomastic surveysCultural + linguistic referencesNo single registry — multiple jurisdictions2026-05-25
🇮🇳HindiCensus of India naming surveys; Sanskrit name dictionaries (Apte, Monier-Williams); Behind the Name — Indian submissionsCensus + linguistic referencesNo central baby-name registry2026-05-25
🇯🇵JapaneseMeiji Yasuda Life — Annual baby-name rankingsIndustry-publishedTop 100 boys + girls, annual2026-05-25
🇨🇳ChineseMinistry of Public Security — National Name ReportsNational registryTop 50 first-name characters; surname distribution2026-05-25
🇷🇺RussianRosstat — vital statistics; Moscow ZAGS published annual listsNational + municipal registriesTop 20 boys + girls, Moscow2026-05-25
🇰🇷KoreanSupreme Court of Korea — annual newborn name statisticsNational registryTop 10–100, annual2026-05-25
🇹🇷TurkishTÜİK — Turkish Statistical InstituteNational registryTop 20 boys + girls, annual2026-05-25
🇳🇱DutchSVB Voornamenbank (Sociale Verzekeringsbank)National registryAll names with ≥1 birth, full historical depth2026-05-25
🇵🇱PolishPolish Ministry of Digital Affairs — Imiona w PolsceNational registryTop 50 boys + girls, annual2026-05-25

Secondary and reference sources

These sources are consulted for etymology, traditional / historical names, native-script forms, and religious / mythological context. They are not used for popularity rankings.

What we do when sources disagree

Disagreements happen, especially on etymology. Our default is:

  1. Prefer the primary national registry over any secondary source for popularity facts.
  2. Prefer a peer-reviewed onomastic reference over a popular baby-name website for etymology.
  3. If two peer-reviewed sources disagree on origin, cite both on the name page and pick the more conservative reading (the one with fewer derivational steps).
  4. Where a native-speaker correction conflicts with a published reference, we update the page and add a note explaining the conflict; the publication is not the final word on a living language.

Datasets we publish in return

The cleaned, classified dataset we use to power the generator is published as /names.js under a permissive licence (see the Dataset declaration in our homepage structured data). Researchers and journalists are welcome to download it, cite it, and challenge it. If you use the data, please credit Baby Name Finder and link to this page so readers can audit our sources.

Found a missing or out-of-date source?

If you know a better source — particularly for languages with no central baby-name registry — please write through the contact form with the URL and what it covers. Submissions that meet our sourcing rules are added with credit.